2007 Virginia Tech shooting / Seung-Hui Cho

LACUNA

Administrator
Virginia Tech will always be the most interesting school shooting to me. Part of it is just how inscrutable some of its presentation was. He left a long, rambling manifesto, both text and video, and yet his motive is basically inscrutable because he couched it in such elaborate, extravagant and obscure terminology (e.g. I am Ax Ishmael. I am the Anti-Terrorist of America). What is Ax Ishmael supposed to mean? The overarching theme is revenge on society but whatever he specifically wants revenge for is unclear - rape, maybe? Literal or figurative?

Manifesto
2 gun.jpgcar .jpgcar 2.pngcar 3.pnggun head.pnghammer.pngIMG_6669.jpgIMG_6912.jpgstanding.jpg

Photos
IMG_1868.jpgIMG_6910.jpgIMG_6911.jpgearly high school.jpgmiddle school.jpgScience club.jpgIMG_6867.jpgunknown 81.pngScreenshot 2025-04-28 024741.pngAlien photo.pngScreenshot 2025-04-28 024757.png

Links:
The text manifesto

Richard McBeef, his play

Mr. Brownstone, his other play
 
This guy saw himself as a martyr and thought that via his attack he would revenge all bullied people.. yes.. revenge bullied people by killing random.

Cho was clearly insane and delirious, in my opinion theres no reason to try to analyze his manifesto, is just ramblings and he's not the only one, I saw not only killer text but randoms says schizo stuff with fancy words that end in nothing.
 
This guy saw himself as a martyr and thought that via his attack he would revenge all bullied people.. yes.. revenge bullied people by killing random.

Cho was clearly insane and delirious, in my opinion theres no reason to try to analyze his manifesto, is just ramblings and he's not the only one, I saw not only killer text but randoms says schizo stuff with fancy words that end in nothing.
I don't agree. He's saying concrete things, just using obtuse and strange phrasing. I don't think he was insane in any way that makes him not culpable or incoherent.
 
Back
Top